Your own personalised stalker
It always seemed slightly creepy that your computer shows advertising that is strangely accurately targeted at things you might have been interested in. On the surface, that seems quite useful. If you have to tolerate ads on your screen, at least having them show things you were interested in seems helpful.
Instead, we wonder how the system knows. It feels like a breach of our privacy.
It all starts when you install an app, and it pops up a question asking for permission to use your location, and/or your camera and/or your microphone.
This is useful for advertisers. For example, they can use your location. If the app reports this back to the content provider, they can match up your location and compare you to other people nearby. If you tend to go to the same places as other people, you are probably interested in the same things, so an advertiser might use that assumption to present advertising to you, or other people that you spend time with.
That does sound a bit overreaching, but we reluctantly agree to the presented terms simply because we want to use the app. If that is a condition of use, and we want to use the app, then we agree.
So, now we are seeing consumers getting the choice to push back.
Apple
Now, with iOS15, Apple are saying that you will get to see what apps are accessing your data. You will be able to see when an app used that permission, and there it was sent to. Whether that list of third party sites is any use or not is meaningful is unclear.
Not quite as advanced but following quickly behind is Google Android. With Android 12, you will have the option to de-personalise your data. They will still track usage, but won’t link it back to you.
Is there any truth to the rumour that your phone or TV is listening to you, and presented content based on private conversations it overhears?
Given how poor the voice recognition is on phones , cars, or tools like Alexa or Siri, its pretty evident this can’t be reality. If it, is, then heaven only knows what it thinks it’s hearing. The voice recognition tools are getting better all the time, but there is a long way to go.
NZ Government “NCSC Minimum Cyber Security Standards”
The NCSC’s new Minimum Cyber Security Standards replace the old Critical Controls checklist with outcomes. What’s in them and what to do next.
Passkeys Explained: A Beginner’s Guide to Signing In Without a Password
What passkeys are, why they’re safer than passwords, and what Microsoft’s 2026 and 2027 sign-in changes mean for your business.
Your Staff Are Already Using AI. Do You Know How, and With What Data?
Shadow AI is already in most businesses. Why visibility matters and how a Business AI Assessment shows what is really happening.
We Have Copilot. Nobody’s Using It. What Should We Do?
Bought Copilot licences but nobody is using them? Why adoption stalls and what the businesses getting real value do differently.
30 Years of Change, and One Thing That Hasn’t
Three decades of IT, from NetWare and dial-up to AI. The technology has changed completely. What matters most has not.
Every Client Is Suddenly Asking Us the Same 3 Questions
Productivity, security and spend: the three questions every leader should ask their IT provider, with straight answers.
Webinar Replay: Microsoft 365 Business Premium, What You’re Probably Not Using (But Should Be)
Most businesses use less than 20% of Microsoft 365 Business Premium. The security features, Copilot and apps you are probably missing.
New Zealand’s Cyber Security Agency Warns Businesses to Get Control of AI Usage
The NCSC has published guidance on managing AI security and data risks. What it says and how to find out where AI is used in your business.
Making Sense of the AI Engines
Which AI engine for which job? A plain-English guide to the models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, DeepSeek, xAI, Meta and Mistral.
Why Would a Hacker Bother to Target Me?
Kaspersky’s 2026 SMB Threat Report shows why small businesses are prime targets, and why fake AI tools are the newest lure.